Research Article

Information and Communications Technology Metaphors

Ömür Akdemir 1 * , Dinçer Biçer 1, Ramazan Ş. Parmaksız 1
More Detail
1 Bulent Ecevit University, Zonguldak, TURKEY* Corresponding Author
Mediterranean Journal of Social & Behavioral Research, 4(1), February 2020, 11-18, https://doi.org/10.30935/mjosbr/9596
Published: 01 April 2020
OPEN ACCESS   1351 Views   1047 Downloads
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

Determination of the perceptions of the prospective teachers for the ICT terms have a remarkable potential to provide input for technology integration plans and ICT trainings. Within this context, the purpose of this study is to discover the metaphors constructed by prospective teachers for the ICT terms. Data were gathered from 180 prospective teachers through survey. 977 valid metaphors constructed by the participants were grouped into conceptual categories for the six ICT terms. The most common conceptual categories are “developing and changing” for the technology, “making life easy” for computers and search engines, “limitless and endless” for the Internet, “means of communication” for social networks, and “addictive items” for video games.
Keywords: metaphors, ICT, teacher education, prospective teachers

CITATION (APA)

Akdemir, Ö., Biçer, D., & Parmaksız, R. Ş. (2020). Information and Communications Technology Metaphors. Mediterranean Journal of Social & Behavioral Research, 4(1), 11-18. https://doi.org/10.30935/mjosbr/9596

REFERENCES

  1. Gecer, A. (2013). Determination of the computer self-efficacy perception of students and metaphors related to “computer ownership” TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 12(3), 51-71.
  2. Gurol, M., & Donmus, V. (2010). Metaphors created by prospective teachers related to the concept of “Social Network”. Procedia Social and Behavioural Sciences, 9(2010), 1489-1496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.354
  3. Jansen, H. (2010). The Logic of Qualitative Survey Research and its Position in the Field of Social Research Methods. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 11(2). Art. 11. https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-11.2.1450
  4. Kobak, M., & Taskin, N. R. (2012). Prospective Teachers’ Perceptions of Technology in Three Diffferent Ways. Procedia Social and Behavioural Sciences, 46(2012), 3629-3636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.118
  5. Koc, M. (2013). Student teachers’ concepts of technology: A metaphor analysis. Computers & Education, 68(2013), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.04.024
  6. Morrison, W. F., & Jeffs, T. L. (2005). Outcomes of preservice teacher’s technology use. Assistive Technology Outcomes and Benefits, 2(1), 71-78.
  7. Saban, A., Kocbeker, B. N., & Saban, A. (2006). Prospective Teachers’ Conceptions of Teaching and Learning Revealed Through Metaphor Analysis. Learning and Instruction, 17(2006), 123e139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.01.003
  8. Teo, T., & Lee, C. B. (2010). Explaining the intention to use technology among student teachers: An application of the theory of planned behavior. Campus-Wide Information Systems, 27(2), 60-67. https://doi.org/10.1108/10650741011033035